LATERAL ENTRY


IN NEWS :
The Indian government’s new lateral entry recruitment strategy has sparked concerns over potential sidelining of reservation policies in the civil services. As of the latest report, 63 appointments have been made through this system, bringing in specialized expertise at senior government positions. The UPSC recently issued a notification for 45 new posts under this system, including Joint Secretaries and Deputy Secretaries, requiring up to 15 years of experience. Notably, the advertisement did not provide for any reserved category posts, raising questions about its impact on diversity and constitutional compliance.
Arguments in Favor of Lateral Entry:
Need for Expertise: Specialized posts in areas like disaster management, semiconductors, FinTech, and emerging technologies require specific expertise that regular IAS officers may not possess. Lateral entrants bring specialized knowledge to policymaking, which is essential for crafting effective policies in these complex areas.
Policymaking vs. Implementation: Lateral entrants are intended for policymaking roles, not for implementation, which typically requires generalists like IAS officers. Experience in top companies can bring a fresh perspective and efficiency to government functions, potentially speeding up decision-making and introducing innovative solutions.
Authority and Responsibility: Lateral entrants in positions like Joint Secretary have the authority to direct people and are responsible for outcomes, similar to career bureaucrats. They can introduce a different working style and management practices from the private sector, which could be beneficial in government operations.
Not Bypassing Reservation: The government has not reduced the number of regular hires but added new positions for lateral entrants. There is a possibility to include reservation provisions in these lateral entry posts, ensuring representation from SCs, STs, and other reserved categories.
Arguments Against Lateral Entry:
Threat to Merit-Based Selection: The UPSC Civil Services Exam is one of the toughest, with a rigorous selection process. Lateral entrants, selected through resumes and interviews, bypass this stringent process, potentially undermining the merit-based system. Lateral entry could lead to a spoils system where political loyalties, cronyism, and corruption may influence appointments.
Connection Between Policymaking and Implementation: Policymaking and implementation are closely linked. Without experience in implementation, lateral entrants may create policies that are impractical or disconnected from on-the-ground realities.
Pakistan’s Experience: Citing Pakistan’s administrative reforms under Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, lateral entry led to the appointment of party loyalists and later military personnel, resulting in a dysfunctional civil service.
Impact on Promotion Prospects: Lateral entry affects the promotion prospects of existing career bureaucrats, as these positions are carved out of the existing posts in the hierarchy.
Reservation Issues: There is a concern that reservations for SCs, STs, OBCs, and EWS may not be applied to lateral entry posts. The UPSC has treated these posts as subject-specific standalone positions, thereby exempting them from reservation policies. The government has acknowledged this issue, and the Minister for Personnel has requested a re-examination of the matter, suggesting that reservations should be considered for these positions.