Recently, India and the United States have engaged in discussions regarding the reduction of tariffs as part of a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). India has proposed lowering tariffs on certain U.S. agricultural products, including almonds and bourbon, as a step toward deepening trade ties and securing favorable terms in the ongoing negotiations. The deal aims to enhance bilateral economic cooperation and market access between the two countries.
Should India reduce tariffs given the U.S.’s moves?
News:
Arguments in Favor of India Reducing Tariffs Given the U.S.’s Moves
- Strengthening India–U.S. Strategic Ties
Reducing tariffs can deepen India–U.S. economic cooperation, building mutual trust in global trade. It also signals India’s commitment to rules-based trade, encouraging smoother negotiations in forums like IPEF or WTO.- Example:In 2023, India reduced tariffs on U.S. agricultural products following bilateral discussions, strengthening trade ties.
- Improving Export Competitiveness
Lowering tariffs on imported raw materials can cut production costs for Indian industries. This makes Indian goods more competitive globally, supporting export-led growth and reducing dependency on protectionism.- Example: Reductions in steel import duties in 2022 helped Indian auto and appliance manufacturers boost exports.
- Encouraging Domestic Efficiency and Innovation
Tariff protection often breeds complacency. Opening up to competition encourages Indian firms to innovate, modernize, and meet international standards, leading to better productivity.- Example: The IT sector, which faced minimal protection, thrived due to global competition and service demand.
- Boosting Consumer Welfare
Lower tariffs reduce prices on essential goods and advanced technology, expanding consumer access and improving quality of life. It helps especially in health, electronics, and education sectors.- Example: Slashing duties on medical devices improved affordability of diagnostic equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Attracting Foreign Investment
Trade liberalization creates a stable and predictable market, which attracts global investors seeking growth. Lower tariffs signal economic openness, drawing FDI into manufacturing and tech sectors.- Example: The reduction of telecom component tariffs attracted companies like Apple and Samsung to expand operations in India.
- Encouraging Domestic Efficiency
Facing global competition can push Indian industries to innovate and upgrade, making them more globally competitive and sustainable in the long run.Example: Indian automobile manufacturers like Tata and Mahindra improved global standards after exposure to international markets.
Arguments Against India Reducing Tariffs Given the U.S.’s Moves
- Protecting Nascent Domestic Industries
Tariff reductions can expose emerging Indian sectors to unfair global competition, hurting small businesses and startups. Strategic protection helps them build capacity before global exposure.- Example: India’s toy industry revived after higher import duties curbed cheap Chinese imports, allowing local manufacturers to grow.
- U.S. Protectionism Remains Intact
The U.S. continues to impose high tariffs and subsidies in critical sectors like agriculture and tech. India reducing tariffs unilaterally would be strategically one-sided and economically risky.- Example: The U.S. maintains subsidies on its dairy sector, disadvantaging Indian exports despite calls for market access.
- Loss of Government Revenue
Tariffs form a significant part of India’s non-tax revenue, funding public welfare and infrastructure. Premature cuts could strain the fiscal deficit and limit development spending.- Example:
The government earned ₹1.5 lakh crore in customs duties in FY 2022–23, a critical source for budget allocations.
- Example:
- Risk to Employment in Sensitive Sectors
Lower tariffs may lead to a surge in imports, threatening millions of jobs in labor-intensive industries like textiles, leather, and food processing. This can worsen rural unemployment.- Example:
After the India–ASEAN FTA, cheap palm oil imports hurt Indian farmers, prompting protests in southern states.
- Example:
- Strategic Autonomy and Supply Chain Security
High tariffs on critical goods ensure domestic manufacturing resilience and reduce dependence on unstable foreign supply chains, especially in defence, pharma, and electronics.Example:
India’s PLI schemes were launched to boost local production of electronics, supported by targeted tariff protections.
- Strategic Autonomy and Supply Chain Security
High tariffs on critical goods ensure domestic manufacturing resilience and reduce dependence on unstable foreign supply chains, especially in defence, pharma, and electronics.- Example: India’s PLI schemes were launched to boost local production of electronics, supported by targeted tariff protections.
Conclusion:
India’s decision to reduce tariffs must strike a balance between global integration and domestic interests. While tariff cuts can strengthen India–U.S. ties, boost exports, attract investment, and spur innovation, they must be implemented selectively to avoid harming emerging industries, employment, and strategic autonomy. A calibrated approach — reducing tariffs where India gains and retaining them where protection is necessary — will ensure economic growth without compromising national resilience.
kawaii UwU